Thursday, February 7, 2019
At the time of McCarthyism, Arthur Miller had a close friend who had :: English Literature
At the time of McCarthyism, Arthur Miller had a wet champ who had been accused and was go outing to nameTHE CRUCIBLEIn 1692, puritan Massachusetts was a concentrated place to locomote. ThePuritans were people who had left England to live a pure and holy lifein America. They obeyed the laws of the bible and were a verysuperstitious group of people. They believed that any behaviour thatopposed the bible, even off the tiniest thing, was of the devil and hiswitches.In 1950s America there was a Senator cal conduct Joseph McCarthy who ledthe Un-American Activities committee. This meant that he wasin charge of ridding the continent of anything that was deemedUn-American. It had non been eagle-eyed since the Second World War and allAmericans were very paranoid somewhat(predicate) the rise of communism in some ofthe eastern European countries. Joseph McCarthy was not at allinterested in putting people in jail but naming names- he wanted to get laid the names of those who were invol ved in communism. This processwas soon to be know as McCarthyism.At the time of McCarthyism, Arthur Miller had a close fri nullify who hadbeen accused and was leading to name names- Miller was angry andbegan to draw up the crucible. The crucible is known as what is calledan Allegory. This means that it is written to subliminally showsomething more or less one thing when it is being described as another. Thecrucible describes the capital of Oregon which trials in 1692 but is meant to showthe complete similarities amongst it and 1950s McCarthyism. both of the main characters in The Crucible are John and ElizabethProctor. We learn at the beginning of the play that John andElizabeth have a very difficult marriage. There is generateth in themistrust between them as we find to learn that John has had an affairwith the reverends niece Abigail. After many events John andElizabeth are sent to prison on the charges of witchcraft. Near theend of the play they meet for one last time to d iscuss their head for the hills ofaction.Faced with a difficult decision, John must choose between life andtruth. This decision is difficult because he wishes to live and seehis children grow up but he dare not lie about committing a crime heis not guilty of. He will do only what his wife wishes. But what isher wish? When her and John setoff meet in the prison she says to himThe children are well. Rebecca Samuels keeps them she says this withthe intent that John will feel a loss on the behalf of his children.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.